AELE LAW LIBRARY OF CASE SUMMARIES:
Employment & Labor Law for Public Safety Agencies
Back to list of subjects Back
to Legal Publications Menu
Pay Disputes - In General
A
firefighters union was entitled to a judgment in its favor when it presented
evidence to support its interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement
that the city was required to give step pay increases to all eligible firefighters.
The City failed to present any real evidence to the contrary. The lawsuit
was filed when the city refused to give pay increases to five firefighters
who qualified for a step increase in pay. Sheridan Fire Fighters Local
No. 276 v. City of Sheridan, #S-12-0108, 2013 WY 36, 2013 Wyo. Lexis 40.
Just before a Naval
Criminal Investigative Service employee was to be transferred from California
to Washington, D.C., she submitted a questionnaire to serve on a California
state grand jury, and was chosen to serve for a year. The Navy allowed
her to serve and paid her salary under a federal statute, 5 U.S.C. Sec.
6322(a). It instructed her, however, not to reapply for another term on
the grand jury. She did, however, and was appointed to serve for a second
one-year term. The Navy then placed her on AWOL status and withheld her
pay, subsequently terminating her. A federal appeals court held that the
U.S. Court of Federal Claims (CFC) erred in rejecting her claims for back
pay on the basis that she had not been "summoned" for grand jury
duty for the second year but sought it voluntarily. The CFC did not, however,
have jurisdiction to hear her wrongful termination claim. Hall v. U.S.,
#2011-5119, 677 F.3d 1340 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
Because the state of Illinois faced a major
fiscal crisis, a union representing 40,000 state employees agreed to postpone
a portion of a wage hike promised in a negotiated contract. Subsequently,
the state legislators refused to appropriate sufficient funds to pay the
deferred wage increases to 75% of the employees. The union's lawsuit against
state officials asserting violations of the Contract Clause of the U.S.
Constitution and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
was barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity. State officials could not be
compelled by such a federal lawsuit to pay funds from the state treasury.
The court also found that there was no Contract Clause violation in the
outcome, which was the result of non-appropriation of funds and a mere
breach of contract, insufficient to establish a constitutional claim. Any
Equal Protection argument would be defeated by the fact that imposing cost
savings measures rationally served a legitimate governmental interest in
light of the fiscal crisis. Council 31 of AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. Quinn, #11–3111,
2012 U.S. App. Lexis 9897 (7th Cir.).
While the adoption
by California of a three-day-per-month furlough program for state employees
reduced the pay of members of the California Correctional Peace Officers
Association, this was within the authority of the state legislature in
revising the state budget, and did not violate state labor or government
codes or the state's minimum wage law. A trial court award of back pay
for the officers was therefore reversed. Brown v. Superior Court, #A127292,
2011 Cal. App. Lexis 1259 (1st Dist.).
Unionized city employees who accepted
early retirement under an incentive program while the city was negotiating
with their unions for new contracts were not entitled to retroactive pay
raises provided for city employees in the new contracts. The early retirement
incentive program did not contain any provisions entitling them to such
back pay, and the new contracts expressly excluded them from receiving
such retroactive payments. This did not violate their due process rights.
Marcatante v. City of Chicago, #10-2114, 2011 U.S. App. Lexis 17683
(7th Cir.).
City employees were not entitled a
four-stage wage increase because the N.Y. legislature imposed a three-year
salary freeze. Matter of Meegan v. Brown, #37, 2011 NY Slip Op 2436, 2011
N.Y. Lexis 470.
When counsel for a party subpoenas a California
peace officer, both the litigant and counsel are the party at whose request
the subpoena is issued and both are liable for the reimbursement of the
officer's compensation. Maddox v. City of Costa Mesa, #G043297, 2011 Cal.
App. Lexis 339 (4th Dist.).
President signs legislation to prohibit statutory
pay adjustments for non-military Federal civilian employees for a 2-year
period. Executive Order, Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay.
New York Public Employment Relations Board
judge dismisses an appeal relating to payments due a public employee. The
charging party failed to appear at a status conference or provide reasons
excusing his absence. Carroll and AFSCME L-870 and Patchogue-Medford, PERB
#U-29075, 2009 NYPER Lexis 120.
Federal court overturns an employer-imposed economic
measure that reduced the work hours of all covered employees by 80 in FY-2009,
reducing the annual salaries of those employees by 3.85%. “The Framers
of the Constitution drafted the Contract Clause (U.S. Const. art. I, §10,
cl. 1.) based on the concern that state governments might enact legislation
to alter, relax or unilaterally modify contractual obligations.” FOP v.
Prince George’s Co., #AW-08-2455, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 72810 (D.Md.).
After a three-year wage freeze had ended,
police officers, firefighters and other employee were entitled to more
than a one-year advancement on their pay scales. They continued to accrue
service credit and climbed the ladder of salary and career increments set
forth in the bargaining agreements, but a partial lifting of the wage freeze
with respect to one union should not have applied to all. Meegan v. Brown;
Foley v. Brown, #322CA-08-00492, 2009 NY Slip Op 4805, 2009 N.Y. App. Div.
Lexis 4721 (4th Dept.).
Bankruptcy
court rules that a city has the authority to void its existing union contracts
in its effort to reorganize. Public workers lack the protections of union
workers for private companies. In re City of Vallejo, Calif., #08-26813,
Memorandum decision (PACER Doc. 473); Findings of Fact & Conclusions
of Law (E.D. Cal. 2009).
Police chief
lacked standing to challenge a new ordinance that effectively reduced his
pay. The suit did not advance a public aim or seek to enforce a public
right. State ex rel. Simeone v. City of Niles, #2008-T-0059, 2008-Ohio-7000,
2008 Ohio App. Lexis 5856 (11th Dist.).
Union members win a ruling to compel DHS and FPS
to obey an order issued by an administrative law judge to pay the prevailing
wages to employees performing contractual services for the Federal Protective
Service. United Govt. Security Officers L-52 v. Chertoff, #07-173, 2008
U.S. Dist. Lexis 95476 (D.D.C.).
Arbitrator upholds a pay grade grievance
where a corporal was temporarily placed in sergeant's position without
receiving the pay differential. The contract was silent on temporary assignments
to acting ranks. Franklin Co. Sheriff's Office and FOP L-9, FMCS Case #070724/58773-8,
125 LA (BNA) 332, (Weatherspoon, 2008).
Arbitrator finds that favoritism resulted
in others receiving merit pay increases, and orders a retroactive pay raise
for the grievant. City of Vandalia and Ohio PBA, 125 LA (BNA) 62 (Paolucci,
2008).
Arbitrator holds that management violated
the bargaining agreement by denying pay shift differential to police officers
that volunteered to work on the swing or night shifts; the term "regular
rate of pay" under the Fair Labor Standards Act includes shift incentives
and differentials. City of Tacoma and Tacoma Police Union L-6, 124 LA (BNA)
642 (Landau, 2007).
In a pay dispute where the employer raised
the defense of prior litigation, a federal court rejects the theory that
each paycheck that a plaintiff receives constitutes a new discriminatory
act; the continuing effects of past discriminatory actions do not resuscitate
time-barred claims. Groesch v. City of Springfield, #04-3162, 2007 U.S.
Dist. Lexis 50009 (C.D. Ill.).
In a case where the county claimed that the
sheriff falsely certified department payrolls, resulting in key employees
receiving unauthorized premium pay adjustments, the sheriff was immune
from liability for negligent misrepresentations, because his erroneous
decision to increase commanders pay involved policymaking. County of Kern
v. Sparks, #F050440, 2007 Cal. App. Lexis 467 (5th Dist.).
A sheriff's dept. that erroneously overpaid
an employee was entitled to a summary judgment to recover the overpayments.
Gibson v. Ada County, #29694, 2006 Ida. Lexis 12 (2006). {N/R}
Arbitrator rules that although the CBA specifically
allowed four hours minimum pay for off-duty court appearances, only actual
hours need be paid for other callback duty, such as a flood response. Columbiana
County Sheriff and FOP, 121 LA (BNA) 902, FMCS Case #05/01634 (D'Eletto,
2005). {N/R} Arbitrator concludes, in a grievance
related to longevity pay, that "years of service" means total
service, and not uninterrupted, continuous service. City of Chehalis and
Teamsters L-252, Wash. PERC Case #18589-A-04-1401 121 LA (BNA) 38 (Schwendiman,
2005). {N/R}
Arbitrator holds that a firefighter that
was reinstated after his termination was overturned was entitled to payment
for 282 hours overtime he likely would have worked, but for the disciplinary
action. City of Barberton and IAFF L-329, 120 LA (BNA) 1367, FMCS #040209/52328
(Goggin, 2004). {N/R}
Arbitrator finds that Treasury Dept. underpaid
its 2003 performance awards program by as much as $6.7 million, affecting
as many as 40,000 IRS employees. The underfunding was due to the fact that
management had used salary projections rather than actual compensation
amounts. National Treasury Employees Union and I.R.S., 42 (2086) G.E.R.R.
(BNA) 1155 (Ross, 2004). {N/R}
Arbitrator holds that a city violated the
bargaining agreement when it refused to pay a police officer for 12 partial
days of jury duty, even though the city changed the officer's schedule
so that the jury appearances would not conflict with his scheduled duty.
City of Urichsville, Ohio and Fraternal Order of Police, 119 LA (BNA) 1723
(Harlan, 2004). [2004 FP Dec]
Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission
holds that it was an Unfair Labor Practice to change the payroll period
from weekly to biweekly, without bargaining with the union. Worcester County
Sheriff's Office and Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union,
#SUP-4531 (Mass. LRC 2004). {N/R}
Federal appeals court rejects a pay discrimination
suit filed by 18 former Chicago Police crime lab scientists who were absorbed
into the Illinois State Police Forensic Services Division. The plaintiffs
were unable to prove the transfer process failed to account for their seniority,
or that incumbent ISP scientists were paid more than them because they
were white; 27 of 51 the former CPD scientists were minorities. Boyd v.
Illinois State Police, #02-2880, 384 F.3d 888, 2004 U.S. App. Lexis 20576,
94 FEP Cases (BNA) 839 (7th Cir. 2004). {N/R}
Arbitrator refuses to enforce a side agreement
to pay a police officer more than the wages indicated in the bargaining
agreement. "The rights and remedies of a bargaining unit member with
respect to wages derive solely from the terms of the collective bargaining
agreement entered into between the employer and the representative union.
An employer cannot enter into separate, private agreements with individual
members of the bargaining unit where the effect of such agreements would
be to contradict the terms of the collective bargaining agreement."
Borough of Brentwood and Teamsters L-205, Pa. Bur. of Mediation #4195,
119 LA (BNA) 1020 (Dissen, 2003). {N/R}
Arbitrator holds that longevity pay is calculated
on the basis of each entire year worked, and does not include a prorated
credit for a partial year. Twp. of Austintown and FOP L- 126,117 LA (BNA)
900, AAA Case No. 53-390-00365-0 (Ruben, 2002). {N/R}
Arbitrator finds that a city did not violate
the bargaining contract when it refused to give officers extra pay for
transporting a prisoner to court during times when the officers are required
to appear at court hearings. City of Amherst and Ohio P.B.A., 117 LA (BNA)
572 (Adamson, 2002). {N/R}
Arbitrator declines to impose wage increases
based on years of service, where there is no history of seniority differentials.
Mason City and IBOT L-828, 117 LA (BNA) 472 (Feldman, 2002). [2002 FP Dec]
212,000 current and former "special
salary rate" federal employees, who worked between 1982 and 1988,
will share more than $173 million in back pay under a class action settlement.
Most awards will be in the $1,000 to $3,000 range, but some workers may
recover as much as $30,000. NTEU v. King, #96-1263, 132 F.3d 736, 1998
U.S. App. Lexis 17 (Fed. Cir. 1998); NTEU v. Horner, #87-1506, 869 F.2d
571 (Fed. Cir. 1989). [N/R]
Arbitrator upholds a grievance that a city
improperly hired a new firefighter at 10% more than the contract minimum
wage. Although allowed under an ordinance, the bargaining history between
the city and firefighters' union prevented this action. Boca Raton (City
of) and I.A.F.F. Local 1560, FMCS #05454-3, 116 LA (BNA) 328 (Abrams, 2001).
[2002 FP Feb]
Arbitrator holds that detectives were not
entitled to a FTO pay supplement if they were accompanied by newly appointed
evidence technicians that they were not required to evaluate -- even though
patrol FTOs were additionally compensated. San Antonio (City of) and San
Antonio POA, AAA Case #70-390-00121-98, 115 LA (BNA) 513 (Moore, 2001).
[2001 FP 72-3]
Miscellaneous one-time events, such as a
delayed check or a failure to receive an overtime check, do not amount
to legally cognizable employment injury. Thomas v. Dept. of Corrections,
77 Cal.App.4th 507, 2000 Cal. App. Lexis 11, 91 Cal.Rptr.2d 770, 00 C.D.O.S.
267 (Cal.App. 2000). {N/R}
City did not violate an officers' equal protection
rights with a new pay structure that calculated his work week at 42.5 hours,
even though the hourly rate of other same-grade city employees were calculated
at a 40-hour work week. Police officers are often required to work during
their lunch breaks, and other city employees are not. Arnold v. City of
Columbia, Mo., 197 F.3d 1217, 1999 U.S. App. Lexis 31550, 5 WH Cases2d
(BNA) 1284 (8th Cir.). (N/R}
Arbitrator holds that public employer was
not required to pay for time spent on recertification training, absent
a provision in the bargaining agreement. Pickaway Co. Sheriff and FOP Ohio,
FMCS Case #99/00168, 112 LA (BNA) 742 (Bell, 1999). [1999 FP 158]
City was not obligated to pay new police
officers the higher amount listed in a recruiting brochure; claimants knew
the correct salary before they accepted their appointments. Williams v.
City of Midland, 932 S.W.2d 679 (Tex.App. 1996). [1997 FP 121]
Arbitrator holds that patrol officers who
function as acting sergeants were entitled to extra pay. Saddle River (Bor.
of) and PBA L-348, NJPERC #AR-95-4474, 106 LA (BNA) 684 (DiLauro, 1996).
[1996 FP 171]
Arbitrator declines to order city to pay
other patrolmen salary increases because one member of the bargaining unit
was receiving a higher rate than he was eligible for. Rye Brook (Vil. of)
and P.B.A., 104 LA (BNA) 822 (Marx, 1995). [1995 FP 170-1]
City was obligated to pay officers for private,
off-duty work details, even though contractor failed to pay the city for
their work. The arbitrator noted the duty involved traffic control at a
construction site, which benefited the town. Winthrop and IBPO L-397, LAIG
#5006 (Higgins, 1994); 3 (9) Pub.Sfty.Lab. News (LRIS) 9. {N/R}
Employer could not deduct its unspecified
losses from employee earnings. Cal. Labor Code Sec. 221 prohibits deductions
for cash shortages, breakage, loss of equipment, sales returns where the
salesperson is not known, and other business losses. Hudgins v. Neiman
Marcus, 41 Cal.Rptr.2d 46 (App. 1995). {N/R}
Representations to an employee that a former
payment policy would be used are not enforceable. The doctrine of equitable
estoppel does not generally apply to acts of public agents. Carson v. City
of Lafollette, 878 S.W.2d 953 (Tenn.App. 1994), citing State ex rel. Dossett
v. Obion Co., 221 S.W.2d 705 (Tenn. 1949). [1995 FP 125]
Refusal to pay corrections officers "hazardous
duty pay" at a minimum security facility did not violate the Equal
Protection Clause. McDermott v. Coughlin, 610 N.Y.S.2d 329 (A.D. 1994).
{N/R}
Alabama rules that a fire dept. was not obligated
to pay the rate advertised in a job announcement. Paseur v. Huntsville,
1994 Ala. Lexis 340, 9 IER Cases (BNA) 1174 (Ala. 1994). [1994 FP 171-2]
Federal appeals court upholds police and
teacher pay reductions in violation of union contracts, reversing a trial
court ruling which found the reductions violated the "Contracts Clause"
of the Federal Constitution. Baltimore City F.O.P. v. Mayor, 801 F.Supp.
1506 (D.Md. 1992); reversed, 6 F.3d 1012 (4th Cir. 1993). [1994 FP 58-9]
Appellate court upholds arbitrator's use
of CPI for future wage increases. Moses Lake (City of) v. I.A.F.F. Local
2052, 847 P.2d 16 (Wash.App. 1993). [1993 FP 155]
An involuntarily terminated worker is entitled
to receive all wages due him. A state law requiring prompt payment of wages
to employees does not exclude those who are fired from their jobs. Duke
v. Norman Eqpmt., 1992 U.S. Dist. Lexis 21152, 30 WH Cases (BNA) 1528 (N.D.
Ind.). {N/R}
City could not rotate sergeants to acting
lieutenant to avoid paying differential salary to a sergeant who would
have been assigned to the acting rank on a long-term basis. City of Boston
v. Boston Police Super. Ofcrs. Fed., 29 Mass. App. 907, 556 N.E.2d 1053
(1990).
Sergeant who was assigned to replace a lieutenant
as platoon commander was not entitled to higher pay. Chaisson v. Dept.
of Police, 556 So.2d 73 (La. App. 1990).
Personnel code which required a survey of
comparable pay for similar positions in public and private employment did
not require inclusion of federal pay positions. Anderson v. State Dept.
of Personnel, 756 P.2d 969 (Colo. 1988).
Although a comparable worth study done by
the City was sound, the law does not release the employer from an obligation
to bargain in good faith nor to totally ignore historical comparisons,
both external and internal. Arbitrators must consider pay equity and pay
compression as a determinant for making an award. Blaine (City of), MN
and Minn. Teamsters L-320, Case No. 87 PN 707, 90 LA (BNA) 549 (Perretti,
2/5/1988). {N/R}
Firefighter lacked standing to challenge
pay raise given other firefighters who were EMT-A qualified. Bowers v.
Columbus Munic. Civil Serv. Cmsn., 34 Ohio App. 280, 518 N.E.2d 584 (1986).
Police technician entitled to supervisory
pay when those duties are regularly performed, along with car allowance
given supervisors. Mokwa v. City of Houston, 741 S.W.2d 142 (Tex.App. 1987).
Predominantly female police dispatchers not
entitled to same pay as predominantly male fire dispatchers. Peters v.
City of Shreveport, 818 F.2d 1148 (5th Cir. 1987).
State police could pay officers in northern
part of state 20 percent more than officers in rest of state. Eldridge
v. Bouchard, 645 F.Supp. 749 (W.D. Va. 1986).
Wardens, jailers and radio dispatchers do
“police work” for minimum pay considerations. Houston County Commission
v. Hart, 477 So.2d 321 (Ala. 1985).
Firefighters allowed to sue city for wage
reductions because city failed to exclude them from new social security
law. Williams v. City of Bastrop, 464 So.2d 1389; subsequent opinion on
merits, 475 So.2d 118 (La. App. 1985).
Elected officials have no right to a “fair”
or “reasonable” salary, but it cannot be reduced when they are in office.
Trinisewski v. Hudock, 494 A.2d 504 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1985).
Court lacks authority to order county to
pay for needed deputies from unappropriated funds. Ledbetter v. Duncan,
676 S.W.2d 91 (Tenn. App. 1984).
Employees on overtime while appearing in
court must turn over witness fees to their department. Perry v. Metropolitan
Dade County, 437 So.2d 295 (Fla. App. 1983).
Employees have no legal right to continuation
of college incentive pay in future years. Foley v. Consolidated City of
Indianapolis, 421 N.E.2d 1160 (Ind.App. 1981).
“Pay compression” assumes that higher differentials
prevailing elsewhere are the norm and, hence that the local structure is
“compressed.” Pay differences between positions in the promotional scheme
“must be taken into account in determining the proper relativity of salaries.”
The phenomenon of “pay compression” occurs where “the differentials between
positions of lower and higher job content are smaller.” Air New Zealand
Ltd. and N.Z. Airline Pilots Assn., 77 LA (BNA) 667 (Perretti 1981). {N/R}
Mayor cannot refuse to pay raises established
by city council over Mayor's veto. City of Gary v. State ex rel. Paris,
406 N.E.2d 1247 (Ind.App. 1980).
Interim service at higher rank, although
no vacancy technically exists, entitles employee to extra pay for that
period. Adams v. Goldner, 79 N.J. 78, 397 A.2d 1088 (1979).
New Hampshire rejects argument that detectives
possess higher skills and should receive greater pay. Wilson v. State Personnel
Cmsn. 387 A.2d 1160 (N.H. 1978).
City can collect overpayment of wages inadvertently
paid firefighters. Moran v. City of Milwaukie, 568 P.2d 711 (Ore. App.
1977).
Kentucky Supreme Court upholds local ordinance
setting hourly firefighter scale before time-and-one-half law became operative.
Snyder v. City of Owensboro, 555 S.W.2d 246 (Ky. 1977).
Emergency law supercedes collectively bargained
contract. Mutual Aid Assn. of Paid Fire Dept. and Local 628, I.A.F.F. v.
City of Yonkers, 401 N.Y.S.2d 98 (A.D. 1978).
Does a change in pay periods entitle firefighters
to a back pay award? Tennessee court finds claims lacking in substance.
Metropolitan Fire Fighters Assn., Local 763 AFL-CIO v. Briley, 524 S.W.2d
671 (Tenn. 1975).
$12 million in back pay to Los Angeles firemen
and police affirmed. Melendres v. City of Los Angeles, 115 Cal.Rptr. 409,
40 C.A.3d 718, aff'd 117 Cal.Rptr. 577 (Cal. 1974).
See also: Fair
Labor Standards Act; Holiday and Premium Pay;
Pay Parity; Stand-by
Pay Claims.