AELE LAW LIBRARY OF CASE SUMMARIES:
Employment & Labor Law for Public Safety Agencies
Back to list of subjects Back
to Legal Publications Menu
Physical Fitness Requirements, Agility Tests and Standards
Monthly Law Journal Article: Weight and Fitness Requirements, 2008 (12) AELE Mo. L. J. 201.
A male flunked out of the FBI Academy by failing by one push-up to complete the 30 push-ups required of male trainees. He sued for sex discrimination on the basis that female trainees were only required to do 14 push-ups. The trial court granted summary judgment to the plaintiff on his sex discrimination claim, and the defendant appealed. The federal appeals court held that an employer does not violate Title VII when it uses physical fitness standards that distinguish between the sexes on the basis of their physiological differences but impose an equal burden of compliance on both men and women, requiring the same level of physical fitness of each. Because the trial court failed to apply this rule in reaching its decision, further proceedings were required. Bauer v. Lynch, #14-2323, 2016 U.S. App. Lexis 379 (4th Cir.).
Ohio State Employment
Relations Board denies an unfair labor practice charge that management
unilaterally implemented a fitness evaluation as part of the promotional
process for deputy sheriffs. The Board found that the fitness evaluation
is voluntary and is not a requirement for promotion. FOP L-101 and Butler
Co. Sheriff, #05-ULP-09-0509, 23 OPER 30, 2006 OPER (LRP) Lexis 31 (Ohio
SERB 2006). {N/R}
N.J. appellate court holds that a compulsory
annual medical examination of police officers, which requires disclosure
of medical history as well as blood and urine testing, does not violate
the state or federal constitutions, and is less intrusive on privacy than
random drug and alcohol testing. New Jersey Transit PBA L-304 v. New Jersey
Transit, #A-5628-03T2, 384 N.J. Super. 512, 895 A.2d 472, 2006 N.J. Super.
Lexis 108 (App. Div. 2006). [2006 FP Jul]
Federal court rejects a police applicant
test that disproportionately disqualified women applicants because it contained
sit-ups and push-ups components that lacked criterion-related validity.
United States v. City of Erie, #04-4, 411 F.Supp.2d 524, 2005 U.S. Dist.
Lexis 33397 (W.D. Pa. 2005). [2006 FP Jun]
Federal court
finds that a Pennsylvania city's physical abilities test for police applicants
had a disparate impact on women applicants and was not job-related or consistent
with business necessity. United States v. Erie, Penna., #04-4, 352 F. Supp.
2d 1105, 2005 U.S. Dist. Lexis 33397 (W.D. Pa. 2005). [2006 FP Mar]
Federal appeals panel rejects a gender discrimination
suit by a vice sergeant who failed the fitness test when her job was combined
with the SWAT unit into a special enforcement unit. Male vice officers
had to pass the same test. Stahl v. Bd. of Cmsnrs. of Unif. Govt. Wyandotte
Co./Kansas City, KS, #03-3068, 101 Fed. Appx. 316, 2004 U.S. App. Lexis
11476 (10th Cir. Unpub. 2004). [2004 FP Oct]
FLRA regional office concludes that management,
in creating a physical fitness program for Pentagon police officers, was
not required to bargain over a grandfather clause or the creation of a
Medical Review and Physical Fitness Board. Pentagon Force Protection Agency
and Frat. Order of Police DPS Labor Committee, FLRA Case #WA-CA-04-0251
(Wash. Region, 2004). [2004 FP Aug]
DoJ sues a Pennsylvania city over allegedly
gender-biased police entry tests. Applicants had to run a 220-yard obstacle
course in 90 seconds; there was a pass rate of 71% for males and 13% for
females. U.S. v. City of Erie, #04-CV-4 (W.D. Pa. filed 2004). {N/R}
Federal court rejects the necessity of a
timed, five-part agility test for prison chaplains. One size fits all testing
was unnecessary in the case of clergy. Jeffrey v. Ashcroft, #3:CV-00-1442,
2003 U.S. Dist. Lexis 17015 (E.D.Pa. 2003). [Dec FP 2003]
A divided federal appeals court, in its second
opinion, upholds a 1.5 mile-12 minute run requirement that disqualified
most women candidates for transit police officer. Lanning v. SEPTA, #01-1040,
2002 U.S. App. Lexis 21506 (3rd Cir. 10/15/2002). [2002 FP Dec]
Justice Dept. drops its opposition
to a timed run used to screen transit police officers in Philadelphia (as
reported in The Legal Intelligencer Oct. 5, 2001). The ruling appealed
from upheld a transit police force requirement that all applicants run
1.5 miles in 12 minutes or less. The trial court ruled (for a second time)
that the test did not unlawfully discriminate against women. Lanning v.
SEPTA, #97-0593, 2000 U.S. Dist. Lexis 17612, 84 FEP Cases (BNA) 1012 (E.D.
Pa. 12/7/2000). [2001 FP 9-10 and 154-5]
Unilaterally implementing a requirement that
firefighters undergo and pass, respirator fitness examinations was mandatorily
negotiable. Utica Prof. F/F L-32 and City of Utica, NY PERB #U-18370, 32
NYPER (LRP) P4570, 1999 NYPER (LRP) Lexis 99 (1999). {N/R}
The protocol of examining a police officer
for a back injury did not constitute treatment or create a physician-patient
relationship. The exam was for the convenience of the employer, and his
medical malpractice action must fail. Durso v. City of N.Y., 673 N.Y.S.2d
651 (A.D. 1998). {N/R}
Third Circuit overturns a 1.5 mile-12 min.
run requirement that disqualified most women police officer candidates;
test was unrelated to overall job performance. Supreme Court denies review.
Lanning v. SEPTA, 1999 U.S. App. Lexis 14607, 181 F.3d 478, 80 FEP Cases
(BNA) 221 (3rd Cir), reversing 1998 U.S. Dist. Lexis 9388, 1998 WL 341605
(E.D.Pa.); cert. den. 120 S.Ct. 970, 2000 U.S. Lexis 820. [1999 FP 137-8;
see 1998 FP 138-140 for prior decis.] Note: on remand, District Court again
upheld the run requirements as a business necessity; see Lanning v. SEPTA,
2000 U.S. Dist. Lexis 17612 (E.D. Pa., Dec. 7, 2000).
Federal appeals court rejects suit by Ohio
state troopers who challenged physical fitness regulations as discriminatory.
They were neither disabled nor "regarded" as impaired. Andrews
v. Ohio, 104 F.3d 803, 1997 U.S. App. Lexis 457 (6th Cir.). [1997 FP 58-9]
Management had a duty to bargain with firefighters"
union before implementing a mandatory agility test, where discipline could
be imposed on those who declined to participate. Meridian (Twp. of) and
F/F Assn. of Mich., MERC #C95-H-174, 9 MPER (LRP) ¶ 27,057, 1996 MPER
(LRP) Lexis 38. [1997 FP 20]
Federal appeals court affirms termination
of fire captain, with a VO2-Max of 28.9, who failed a spirometer test.
VO2-Max requirement of 33.5 upheld in an ADA and ADEA challenge. Smith
v. Des Moines, #95-3802, 99 F.3d 1466, 1996 U.S. App. Lexis 29340, 72 FEP
Cases (BNA) 628, 6 AD Cases (BNA) 14 (8th Cir. 1996). [1997 FP 11]
Oregon arbitrator finds that a fire dist.
violated the employment agreement by ordering firefighters to perform an
endurance test. Klamath Falls Fire Dist. and K.F. Firefighters L-890, 106
LA (BNA) 789 (Buchanan, 1996). [1996 FP 153-4
Iowa city could adopt an annual physical
fitness test for the retention of firefighters, but those who fail it must
be allowed to challenge the validity of the test. Des Moines v. Civil Serv.
Cmsn., 540 N.W.2d 52 (Iowa 1995). [1996 FP 105]
Firefighter applicant who was injured while
taking a preemployment agility test could recover against the municipality
for any negligence. A “release of all liabilities” form was unenforceable
and against public policy. White v. Vil. of Homewood, 628 N.E.2d 616 (Ill.App.
1993). {N/R}
EEOC's A.D.A. Guidelines allow pre-offer
agility and physical fitness tests provided they are job-related and necessary.
EEOC: Enforcement Guidance on Pre-Employment Inquiries Under the A.D.A.,
FEP Manual (BNA) 405:7208-09 (#748, 1994). [1994 FP 138]
N.H. Federal Court enjoins use of biased
firefighter agility tests and orders employment of a rejected woman applicant.
Legault v. aRusso, 64 FEP Cases (BNA) 170 (D.N.H. 1994). [1994 FP 104-5]
St. Paul Fire Dept. settles a sex discrimination
suit and formally adopts the Davis Criterion Task Test. Minn. Dept. of
Human Rts. v. City of St. Paul, #8-1700-3224-2; 28 (1380) G.E.R.R. 1143
(M.O.A.H., 1990) and 32 (1556) G.E.R.R. (BNA) 362 (M.O.A.H., 1994). [1994
FP 93-4]
Justice Department obtains consent decree
against Delaware City that rejected female applicants who failed physical
tests. U.S. v. New Castle County, Del., U.S. Dist. Ct. (D. Del. 1984).
Preservice agility tests for St. Paul Fire
Dept. ruled discriminatory and unsupported by realistic job requirements.
Minn. Dept. of Human Rts. v. City of St. Paul, Office of Admin. Hrgs. #8-1700-3224-2,
28 (1380) G.E.R.R. (BNA) 1143 (8/24/90). Case later settled; see 94 FP
93-4.
Federal court in Cleveland upholds physical
agility tests for firefighter applicants; court concludes that anaerobic
component is more important than aerobic component. Zamlen v. City of Cleveland,
48 FEP Cases (BNA) 1489 (N. D. Ohio 1989).
Federal court rejects physical agility test
in Illinois Police Department insufficient test validity. Thomas v. City
of Evanston, 610 F.Supp. 422 (N.D. Ill. 1985).
Lowering physical agility test scores for
all does not discriminate against male applicants. Patrolmen's Benevolent
Assn. v. Township of East Brunswick, 180 N.J. Super. 68, 433 A.2d 813 (A.D.
1981).
Appellate court upholds rejection of police
applicant who failed the running test. He was not entitled to substitute
a different test because another candidate was allowed to do so. Ferrante
v. Niagara Co., 551 N.Y.S.2d 134 (A.D. 1990).
Appellate court says injunction is not a
proper way to contest validity of new physical endurance standards of correctional
officers who are selected for or retained in an emergency response unit.
Eberle v. State of Mo. Dept. of Corrections, 779 S.W.2d 302 (Mo.App. 1989).
Federal court upholds timed wall climb, dummy
drag and agility movements for police applicants in Texas. Test was job-related
even if it had a disparate impact on female applicants. U.S. v. City of
Wichita Falls, 704 F.Supp. 709 (N.D. Tex. 1988).
Federal court upholds L.A.F.D. weight standards
challenged by paramedics. United Paramedics of L.A. v. City of Los Angeles,
#89-1182R, U.S. Dist. Ct. (C.D. Cal. 3/8/89).
State failed to establish health and fitness
qualifications reasonably necessary for job; age was therefore not bona
fide occupational qualification. EEOC v. Mississippi, 837 F.2d 1398 (5th
Cir. 1988).
U.S. Supreme Court declines to review federal
appeals court decision on physical fitness tests for firefighter positions.
Berkman v. City of N.Y., 580 F.Supp. 226, 1983 U.S. Dist. Lexis 11022,
43 FEP Cases (BNA) 290 (E.D.N.Y. 1983); aff'd, 705 F.2d 584, 1983 U.S.
App. Lexis 29269; 31 FEP Cases (BNA) 767 (2nd Cir. 1983); modified 812
F.2d 52, 1987 U.S. App. Lexis 2329, 43 FEP Cases (BNA) 318 (2nd Cir. 1987);
certiorari denied, 108 S.Ct. 146 (1987).
Employee may be discharged for physical inability
to do work. Pierce v. Franklin Electric Co., 737 P.2d 921 (Okla. 1987).
Loudermill also applies to a non-disciplinary
medical/fitness termination. Feder v. Pope. 489 So.2d 270 (La. App. 1986).
Fire Dept. could not impose a height requirement
without establishing a BFOQ. Micu v. City of Warren, 382 N.W.2d 823 (Mich.
App. 1986).
New Jersey appellate court upholds mandatory
fitness tests; not a proper subject for bargaining or arbitration. Twp.
of Bridgewater v. P.B.A. Local 174, (N.J. App. 1984).
Federal court upholds physical and training
standards retroactively imposed on experienced volunteer firefighters.
Alexandria Volunteer Fire Dept. Inc. v. Rule, Civil #82-0621-A, Unreported,
U.S. Dist. Ct. (E.D. Va. 1982); aff'd w/o Opin., U.S. Ct. of App. (4th
Cir. 1984).
Public safety agency may require promotional
candidates to meet physical fitness standards; employees not entitled to
compensation to maintain their physical fitness. State FOP L-1 v. State
of Ohio, 4 Ohio St. 3d 23, 446 N.E.2d 157 (1983).
Lowering of physical agility test scores
for all does not discriminate against male applicants. Patrolmen's Benevolent
Assn. v. Township of East Brunswick, 180 N.J. Super. 68, 433 A.2d 813 (A.D.
1981).
Florida arbitrator reinstates Christian Scientist
who refused to participate in a blood test. City of Clearwater and Florida
State L-10, F.O.P., 79-80 PBC ¶ 45,321 (Greene, 1980).
Mandatory physical fitness program upheld
by New Hampshire public employee labor relations board; not a term or condition
of employment. L-1312 IAFF v. City of Dover Fire Dept., Case #F-0102:1,
Decision #79021 (NH PELRB, 1979).
Failure to take medical exam or continue
to work constitutes neglect of duty; dismissal upheld. Matter of McCann,
385 A.2d 621 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1978).
New York Appellate Court affirms right of
city to order captain to submit to a physical examination. Peck v. Sartori,
399 N.Y.S.2d 291 (A.D. 1977).
See also: Handicap
Discrimination; Hearing Impairment; Sex
Discrimination; Visual Acuity Standards
for other cases. Vision standards are compiled under "Visual
Acuity Standards." Weight standards are compiled under "Obesity.'